Measurement and management of credit concentration risk is critical for banks and relevant for micro-prudential requirements. While several methods exist for measuring credit concentration risk within institutions, the systemic effect of different institutions' exposures to the same counterparties has been less explored so far. In this paper, we propose a measure of the systemic credit concentration risk that arises because of common exposures between different institutions within a financial system. This approach is based on a network model that describes the effect of overlapping portfolios. We calculate this measure of systemic network concentration on a few data sets reporting exposures of financial institutions and show that typically the effect of common exposures is not fully contained by information at the level of single portfolio concentration. As a result, we show that an optimal solution that minimizes systemic risk is to be found in a balance between these two, typically different and rather divergent, effects. Using this network measure, we calculate the additional capital corresponding to the systemic risk arising from credit concentration interconnectedness. This adjustment is additional to both the original capital requirement from Basel II and the granularity adjustment of each portfolio. We also develop an approximated methodology to avoid double counting between the granularity adjustment and the common exposure adjustment. Although approximated, our common exposure adjustment is able to capture, with only two parameters, an aspect of systemic risk that goes beyond a view over single portfolios and analyzes the complexity of the interplay among (risk-adjusted) exposures.
↧